There
is no denying the fact that the financial system relating to South Asian regional
countries are basically level-headed rather than harmonizing as the commodities
have a propensity to be similar in the extractive or primary industries for
consumable goods. Only in the more sophisticated mechanized and capital goods
would there be scope for a non-competitive trade, but this would tremendously
benefit India
which alone has a considerable consumer goods produced in the manufacturing
industry. However, these sectors of production, regardless of some lower
transportation costs, are not necessarily cheaper or equal quality to foreign goods
and therefore there is limited benefit for smaller states to import from India.
The
extra-regional export pattern of the SAARC countries is mutually competitive
rather than complementary. Jute goods are exported by Bangladesh as well as India. Tea exports are shared by Sri Lanka, India
and Bangladesh.
Pakistan competes with India in the
world’s high quality rice market as well as in the cotton goods. Of late, Nepal has fulfilled a significant percentage of
demand for hand-made carpets along with India
and Pakistan.
The SAPTA Agreement provides the least developed member states to encourage
their export prospects through technical assistance and co-operation
arrangements to increase their production capacities. The achievement of complementarily
in products under SAPTA may not be possible due to the absence of technical
co-operation and development financing in the South Asian countries.
Diversified attitude of SAARC member states about financial and monetary
co-operation create problems among SAARC states. All members are not equally in
same opinion about the creation of a regional development bank, a regional
import-export bank and a regional finance corporation.
Suffice
it to say that SAARC countries have diversified interest in economic field. The
formulation of a common strategy whether in respect of export or import may
fumble at different stages because for such states as Bangladesh, Nepal
and Bhutan, agricultural
produce may figure prominently but for others i.e. India
and Pakistan,
finished products may be in an intermediate position? There is wide diversity
in the levels of development in South Asia.
The smaller states have feared that trade liberalisation may benefit the larger
countries more. They also worried that this liberalisation will create relations
of dominance and dependence between strong and weak partners.
In
view of the above it is evident that in promoting co-operation among a group of
politically and economically heterogeneous countries as in SAARC is in fact not
an easy task and is bound to involve a wide range of issues and problems confronting
the member states. For transforming South Asia
as a homogeneous system, appropriate transfer of loyalty and legal authority to
the regional representative supranational body is an essential prerequisite.
There should also be some conflict reducing mechanism, capable of settling
regional disputes as well as circumventing instability and violence.
No comments:
Post a Comment