We should be spending taxpayer’s money by way
of treating with the self infected disease by dealing poor life styles. Illness related
to smoking as well as drug addicts is very expensive. In U.K., France, Germany,
China and USA, it results in the loss of
about 60 millions working days a year, treatment costs several hundreds
thousands dollar a day, and it causes the death of over a million people a
week. However, those who give up smoking greatly reduce their chances of
developing diseases. There exists a
remarkable extent of evidence that a variety of awful diseases emerge often in
smokers and tremendous drug addicts, these are: Lung cancer; emphysema causing
thinning and weakening of lung tissue; cancer of the mouth, throat, larynx,
gullet, bladder, and pancreas; coronary thrombosis causing snarl-up of arteries
to the heart; angina pectoris causing pain due to contraction of arteries to
the heart; and chronic bronchitis with phlegm. Moreover, Smoking emerge due to
delay in healing of stomach ulcers; it trims down the senses of smell and
taste; slows down reflexes which causes smokers more prone to accidents; and
gives an unpleasant smell from the breath, clothes, and homes of smokers. For
all these reasons, the people of drug addicts suffer tremendously as well as
mentally for which they deal poor life styles.
In view of the
above, it is evident that a huge amount of money is involved for treatment of self
creating diseases which are the mischievous hazards of life. In western world,
they spend to pay taxpayers money which is the complete misuse on the part of
the parents, youths and professionals. Due to continuous practice in taking
drugs, one becomes the sufferer of heart disease and coronary infections.
Leukemia is such disease where whole body infection takes place and cancer
causing substances slowly get into the blood for which lives of the people
become distorted and miserable.
4. Would not it be better to spend the money on education so
all know the risk?
Yes, it is
better to spend the money on education because risks and uncertainness for self
creating diseases from smoking and drug addicts like thinning and weakening of
lung tissue; cancer of the mouth, throat, larynx, gullet, bladder, and pancreas;
coronary thrombosis causing snarl-up of arteries to the heart; angina pectoris
causing pain due to contraction of arteries to the heart; and chronic
bronchitis with phlegm. Due to the fact, proper education enlightens the life
of the people and flourishing. We should not spend money on other addictions
which tremendously harm our physical and mental distortions. We need to know
more things by way of education, culture and heritage as compared to western
world. By way of education, our morality stands on an erect base which cannot
be decayed easily. By continuous ill practice due to illiteracy, we can easily
be involved with malevolence and corruption. Morally wrong in social life
influence some one to die ultimately.
5. Who should
decide? Should government impose laws or are individuals responsible for
themselves?
It is logical
argument in the sense that total eradication of such disease lays both in
individual and government level. Because, government should create awareness
among the social life so that the people can understand the utility of being
more cautious about drug addict and smoking. Smoking emerge due to delay in
healing of stomach ulcers; it trims down the senses of smell and taste; slows
down reflexes which causes smokers more prone to accidents; and gives an
unpleasant smell from the breath, clothes, and homes of smokers.
Individuals have
more responsibility not to be involved in socially irresponsible life. The
society cannot permit in illicit connection with any other things. The government
should check the utmost irrelevant objects and as such they should take part
actively to eradicate the poisonous effects of using unusual critics.
6. But would people
take any notice, would not they still wish to eat fatty foods, smoke too and
lead sedentary life styles?
The people as
well as the law enforcing agency should be careful about heart diseases. They
should not take much junk foods, fatty foods and over smoking. We need to be
educated and morally strong so that we can easily avoid such health hazards. There
exists a remarkable extent of evidence that a variety of awful diseases emerge
often in smokers than non-smokers and these diseases are: Lung cancer;
emphysema causing thinning and weakening of lung tissue; cancer of the mouth,
throat, larynx, gullet, bladder, and pancreas; coronary thrombosis causing
snarl-up of arteries to the heart; angina pectoris causing pain due to
contraction of arteries to the heart; and chronic bronchitis with phlegm.
Moreover, Smoking emerge due to delay in healing of stomach ulcers; it trims
down the senses of smell and taste; slows down reflexes which causes smokers
more prone to accidents; and gives an unpleasant smell from the breath,
clothes, and homes of smokers. Very current survey illustrates that smokers
endanger the health of non-smokers. Pregnant women smokers tend to have smaller
babies than non-smokers, and their babies are more likely to be born dead or
die a few days after birth. Besides such tremendously adverse affects, the
children of smoking parents have more lung infections in the first years of
life than the children of non-smokers. During one hour in a smoky room, a
non-smoker can inhale as much cancer-causing substances as some one smoking 15
filter-tip cigarettes.
Illness related
to smoking is very expensive. In U.K., France, Germany, China and USA, it results in the loss of about 60
millions working days a year, treatment costs several hundreds thousands dollar
a day, and it causes the death of over a million people a week. However, those
who give up smoking greatly reduce their chances of developing diseases. Hence
it is obvious that smoking has been unenthusiastic every times and as such,
even in general advertisement to sell their product, the work of publication of
product’s brand name and packaging system to indicate the quality of the
product has been banned.
In view of the
above, it is evident that if we create social awareness we should check our
heart diseases. Individuals have more responsibility not to be involved in
socially irresponsible life. The society cannot permit any illicit connection
with several other things being hard and painstaking. The government should
check the utmost irrelevant objects and as such they should take part actively
to eradicate the poisonous effects of using unusual critics.
7. How about
heart transplants, would you donate n your heart to someone else?
No, normally I
cannot donate my heart to some body. After death, if heart is active and keep
balance its real structure, it can be donated. In modern science, nowadays,
heart can be transplanted. Even, monkeys’ heart is being transplanted on a
large scale through out the world. It is evident that modern appliances have
been upgraded magically and as such heart operation and its transplanting is
not a major problem. Even the good doctors are being successful spontaneously
every times, and they are applying new concepts and techniques to beam laughter
of the patient in their face.
The doctors
should be cautious and sincere even they take active measure in more devotion
to patients specifically in case heart transplantation.
8. What is stem
cell research? Where do the stem cells come from? Do they come from embryos?
Stem cell
research is such a research where a new embryo is to be explored on women so
that a clone foetus is possible to be transplanted. It comes from new and old
embryo. The women who are devoid of producing babies, stem cell research
develops the new cell along the growth of adipose tissue. As a result, all
sorts of chemicals are provided to the patient through placenta.
The growth of
the clone lies with the normal capillaries faction along heart. May be we can
use these cells to grow new hearts in a test tube and transplant them ideally
so that the groups of blood can be properly tested.
9. May be we can
use these cells to grow new hearts in a test tube and transplant them into sick
people. Is this beneficial use of science?
By virtue of
modern science and medical technology, we can use cells to grow new hearts in a
test tube. The women who have no capacity to produce child, test tube baby can
be developed in different embryo of the women’s sac underneath abdomen. In
different techniques an embryo is developed in the test tube and after several
observations such embryo is matured and instituted into the woman. Not only in
our country, can a new heart be grown simultaneously on the cells as every
times flourished as a tentative flow. If such inside baby pigment is
transplanted into the sick people, baby will be grown not in due incubation.
Many disrobing problems may be infected in due course.
10.
Actually pig heart is permissible only in Christian
community. But for the sake of life saving pig heart is better for
transplanting.
Let
alone religion, survival on earth is a vital question. The Muslims use
prescribed medicine produced from pig’s fat and brain. The pigs’ heart is
strong enough as it has structural phenomena like humans. Even monkeys heart is
now a day transplanted in western world.
11.
Basically, it is not ethical from the point of religion and
transitivity on a pattern of growth of the tissue virtually.
The scientists
are carrying out experiment on pigs’ heart that is legible based and defined
perspectives. As the muscles and cells growth on pericardium take place, its growth
is rapid. It is risky in the sense, capillaries and blood vessel carry blood on
hard complicacies for which in many countries such transplantation has been
discouraged.
12. Pigs only
live for 20 years its hearts decay quicker than ours as the pattern cells decay
too rapid than ours. All oils and hydrolysis substances can be dissolved
properly in pigs. The fatty muscles are strictly attached with the adipose of
the pigs. The necessary chemical
produced in adipose tissue is provided to its liver and quickly enzymes are
produced and used. For this reasons, humans’ legibility is longer than pigs.
Pigs heart is decayed quickly but humans heart is stronger than pigs for which
the decay rate is less than that of pigs.
No comments:
Post a Comment