William Shakespeare, a world-class
English poet and dramatist has presented his Hamlet as a symbol of human
conflicts in special literary approach and attitude of life, which visualizes
the cryptogram of human distinction and divergence as the mirror image of
social problems. Hamlet is the name of a philosopher, who is terrifically
favourite in the eye of the book lovers who are the significant aficionados of
Shakespeare. It has duly stimulated the heart of the readers in view of its
beauty of truth to develop the maxim of human tribulations and its prevalent
solutions. William Shakespeare was the utmost author for all times. He was the
only personality who had discovered firstly the measurement of human psychology
and stressed the amplified truth of beauty inside the literary mind-set. In
Hamlet, he had critically examined the philosophy of human conflicts and tried
to bring about a change in between the resentment of men and women.
Shakespeare's Hamlet has been
accessible as a token of model personality who had tried to his utmost heart to
enlighten his inquisitiveness feelings about his father's death. He was amazed
to see the uncle's behaviors for his matrimony with his mother. He was
emotionally tormented with thoughts about his unusual departure from this
short-lived world. He was informed about his father's death but it was falsely
implicated. Despite this darkness, he came to learn about his father's killers
by way of the ghostly spirit of his father.
But he was found restless in the
state of meticulous suspicion about his father's death. So he arranged to act a
play ' The murder of Gongago' where the facts and the critics of the drama will
cause the killers predominated to understand their reactions of mind for commission
of crimes which was heinous in the eye of a healthy society. There after, he
was confirmed about the culprits of his father who left him desolated like
unseen and unknown about what had happened to him. He promised to take revenge
against them - Claudius and his mother. His famous remarks are widely vibrated
towards the audience greatly. He uttered to his utmost heart as an outcry of
his feelings for survival on earth. " To be or not to be, that is the
question". He was dedicated within himself that he would either die or
live in taking revenge. He had delayed to revenge in the sense that he was
suffering from indecision. He was at a loss what to do because he was finding
out an opportunity to take revenge against the culprits. He was inclined to act
as a mad man in the stage as his pretext made others to keep him in the dark.
Claudius thought that Hamlet had some clues to identify them in connection with
the conspiracy against the King Hamlet. He adopted the policies of soliloquy to
understand the depth of taking revenge.
Due to the fact that he had mental
strength to get sufficient energy to requite the challenge to punish his uncle
and his mother. He wanted to enforce mental afflictions by his unusual
philosophy of life for finding out a conclusion to identify the culprit to his
inquiring feelings. According to Hamlet, he would not kill Claudious in the
state when he remains in supplication in the church in the sense that he would
achieve a good harvest in the world hereinafter. He was finding out a way to
kill him where he would get real peace and composure of his life and he will be
conversant with the fact that he was right in fulfilling his mission and his
father would get peace in due sense of perpetual happiness in the world
hereinafter. On the whole, he was suffering from indecision to take revenge
against them. In this connection, T.S. Elliot, in his famous poem, 'My love
song of J. Alfred Prufrock', has brought contrast of similarities and
comparison between Hamlet and Prufrock who like Hamlet had suffered from
indecision. Prufrock was a man of indecision and like modern man and modern
dress; he seems to be mentally and physically incapacitated to perform his
task. But, in facing real life situation, he is completely different. He has no
power to face his own lady rather he has delayed to take action against her
like the prince Hamlet. Due to the fact, Hamlet, despite his mental alertness
and capacity to revenge against the culprits, he has delayed in the sense that
he knows the philosophy of life and social friction, which was bedstead on
courage and hardihood. He does not like to take action like a race of fickle
minded man who has no commitment against evil doings in social life. Prufrock
has counted time like frogs, cat and other mini creature to take action for his
beloved who persistently does not like him to be intimated, as he deems fit
tremendously. Hence the poet Elliot says in the voice of Prufrock:
" My morning coat, my collar
mounting firmly to the chin
My necktie cheap and modest asserted
by a simple pin"
William Shakespeare has depicted a
truth of beauty in his famous book Hamlet. He has open-minded a realm of ideals
of such man who is never found fickle minded and suffers from indecision to
uproot the evils from the society. Hamlet was a philosopher, poet and social
reformer but in spite of such quality concealed in him, he was not rigid in his
conception to embed the action against evils. He was not bedded on full courage
and social reforms as he was in the habit dedicating to find faults of the
culprits. In fine, he was successful in doing the actual deeds, which he
confirmed after lots of decision and logical arguments. The queen and the
others identified him as their fast foe and tried to end his life. In Hamlet,
William Shakespeare has accelerated the views of conspiracy and conflicts of
human affliction in a significant manner. The author has collected materials
from social surroundings where men and women relationships and philosophy of
reality and the realms of survival are coherent on earth by bringing a factual
contrast of feeling of mankind. He upheld some literary manifestation in the
pages of his mind, which acted like the mirrors of social unrest and evils
committed by them.
Shakespeare was only the personality
who understood the modern philosophy of life and the culture that traditionally
reflected social conflicts and contrasts spontaneously. He introduced two
trends of conflicts that were of tragedy and the play within tragedy. Hamlet
was a play of misfortunes and social conflicts, which were accepted by the then
social conditions and the crisis as reflected in his play for accelerating the
basic strategy of life. If we judge the conflicts of Hamlet's mind, we will
find such way of human psychology which is tremendously extensive and critical
in due sense of social friction. Ophalia had deep intimacy with Hamlet but she
had nothing to do for Hamlet. Due to the fact, according to her, Hamlet was not
as a man of parts but a man of cowardice for which she began to create her own world
of abandonment. The three characters of Shakespeare's play are notable but they
are nimble in the sense that they were bedded on fully hallucination and their
own persuasions. These three characters are: Desdemona, Ophalia and Cordelia
who had nothing to do something favorable and winning to their beloved.
It is an analytical sensation for
human beings whether Hamlet had decided himself to die. It is his spontaneous
conflicts of his mind critically because he had reactions and it was not
credible on his part and takes evil notice to the superiors. He made
arrangements of the play and observed the movements and attitude their feelings
for the killings of his father. Regarding lunacy of Hamlet, he was not mad but
he was inclined to pretend mad himself. It was happened in the sense, human
beings are fickle minded in nature. He was in the way to commit wrong and for
this reason, he may forget the justice for self-devotion towards eternity.
In this connection, we find
consistence of Hamlet's outcries with the following lines of the poem composed
by Ella Wheeler Wilcox:
" Laugh and the world laughs
with you,
Weep and you weep alone,
For the sad old earth must borrow its
mirth
But has trouble enough of its
own"
In the last part of the story, we
find all ends of both plaintiff and delinquent. Hamlet has been ended with all
ends of his rivals and culprits. In his last message to Horatio, his friend, he
has asked him to tell the actual event of retribution to the people of the
world that Hamlet after getting unbounded mental repugnant and afflictions, he
had had his revenge in the end against the killers of his father. In fine, we
memorialize such Hamlet in the sense, no one is above human conflicts and the
shrine of justice, being the king and the queen, all must suffer in the long
run for all misdeeds. In this context, H.W. Longfellow says, " Man is
unjust, God is just and finally justice triumphs"
No comments:
Post a Comment